Traveling Through Time

UDM Libraries / IDS Digital Repository

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lamfers, Heather
dc.date.accessioned 2020-09-09T16:54:49Z
dc.date.available 2020-09-09T16:54:49Z
dc.date.issued 2020-09-09
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10429/2046
dc.description Place. According to Marcus Garvey, “A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.” Without people stories will have no “roots” and no grounding. They will cease to exist. Memory, as Dylan Trigg believes, is essential to place and place is essential to memory, for without memory, place is lost. As memory of places start to disappear the history is lost and the building loses its sense of belonging. With a loss of belonging the building is not as well protected against demolition. One cannot make a memory without being present in an environment. Place is more than the built environment. It is about the human interactions and experiences that connects with the environments will be linked together. This relation between engagement of the place leads to Culture. According to the interior standards there are four categories of historic preservation. Restoration, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and preservation. However, historic preservation should not always be just one category. If you restore it fully to a previous time period, the space may become one like a museum. Instead a combination of modern and of historic preservation allow for a mixture of historic yet functional to today’s societal needs. Without a combination, the space is preserved as is and is susceptible to not meeting the needs of today. Then it could revert to the condition before preservation or rehabilitation, or restoration. Historic Preservation in specific situations needs to be mixed with new architecture to meet today’s user’s needs. Vision is one of the most used senses of the body. We judge spaces on whether the space is visually appealing. However, the other senses aren’t engaged within a space as much. Through engaging multiple senses, the engagement would be more powerful and have a longer lasting affect on the user. Using senses can aid in telling a story of a space. You can feel, see, hear, smell and taste the past. Engaging multiple senses helps deepen the connection to the past and allows the space to be captivating. Enhancing the senses through the stories of the past allows a deeper engagement and connection to a built environment. Humans rely heavily on visual, but the other senses are just as powerful. How can other senses be pulled into architecture to enhance engagement through multiple materials? How can a space engage both the historical and the new through the senses? en_US
dc.description.abstract Historic preservation is researched through the integration of modern elements to fully engage the users of the space. Sensorial architecture engages with historic concepts to create a new understanding of the past. Multi-sensorial elements are investigated to create a deeper knowledge and interaction of the story of the lunchroom. The lunchroom is designed through the lenses of memory, body and place. Creating a place through engaging the community and creating a space of interactions. Studying how a space can become a place through the creation of memories in which communities and culture are created. Place is created through communal interactions and engagement. Engagement includes both physical and emotional engagement. Body engages the built environment in many ways. Combining memory, body, and place to further critique historic preservation and sensorial architecture. Innovating ways to design a building to preserve a place through sensorial engagements. A deeper investigation into the past of the Chicago Union station allows the layers to be uncovered. Through these historic layers an understanding of the significant events within the lunchroom occurs. The significance and importance of the space allows a redesign that highlights the past and connects the station with the west loop neighborhood. Programs are developed through a site analysis and the best way to draw the neighborhood in can be determined. Creating a place that engages the neighborhood and passengers is important in preserving historic spaces within the Chicago Union Station. Creating places where multiple programs can occur while drawing users who are not just passengers in to utilize the space. Allowing the Union Station to become a social area for the neighborhood and becoming a bigger asset to the neighborhood and Chicago. en_US
dc.subject architecture en_US
dc.subject Chicago en_US
dc.subject on-site observation en_US
dc.subject historic preservation en_US
dc.subject community en_US
dc.subject history en_US
dc.subject memory en_US
dc.subject body en_US
dc.subject place en_US
dc.subject past en_US
dc.subject movement en_US
dc.title Traveling Through Time en_US
dc.title.alternative Combining Historic Preservation with Sensorial Architecture in Chicago Union Station en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account