Abstract:
The evolution of urban space and architecture is not only indicative of societal changes through time, but it also serves as a medium for investigating the intricate relationship existing between society and the political-economic power structure in which that society functions. The resulted disturbances of urban space due to the wavering tendencies of this correlation give rise to new inquiries regarding the complex role the post-democratic ideology plays within architectural discourse and practice. As a seemingly more influential Corporate-State infiltrates the elected power of present governing bodies, is the identity of our urban environment correspondingly mutating along this seam shared with political power? In light of the current events surrounding the Occupy Wall Street Movement and the Arab Spring in the east, citizens across the globe are utilizing, and in some cases demanding, their right to actively participate in their respective political regimes, some democratic and others not. This political engagement has predictably been met with stark criticism and opposition from politicians and citizens alike, creating a buzz of media attention. Although there is always just cause to challenge the intentions of any mass movement, there is also reason to stand in amazement at the pure speed and intensity propelling the current protests. Accessible technological devices, e.g. the cell phone and other wireless devices, have provided new “weapons” for the demonstrators and revolutionaries. Consequently, both work with an efficiency that is historically unrivaled. In a political system built to favor groups and not the individual, citizens must find new channels of political participation in order to instigate societal change. The post–democratic citizen must become a virus.
